Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Committees arrow Historic Preservation & Development arrow A New U Street Destination? JBG's "U Street Hotel"
A New U Street Destination? JBG's "U Street Hotel" Print E-mail
Written by U Street Neighborhood Association   
Thursday, 05 February 2009
JBG's U Street Hotel
JBG's U Street Hotel. Image courtesy of JBG
The JBG Companies are currently working on a project proposal to develop a transit oriented, LEED Silver certified mixed-use hotel to be built at the corner of 13th and U Street, NW, replacing the existing building at this corner.  This proposal, named by JBG as the "U Street Hotel," has been the focus of much discussion in the neighborhood; JBG has provided information to CSNA about the current status of this project.  
 
JBG is currently working with neighbors of the project to address a full range of issues and concerns that accompany any project of this size.  JBG continues to make modifications to address these issues and will be making a formal presentation to CSNA in the next few months.  Please share your thoughts on this project in the comments section below.
 
According to JBG, plans call for an approximate 4-Star hotel, best described as boutique and independently managed. The hotel will consist of as many as 250 guestrooms, 4,500 square feet of meeting space and 23,000 square feet of retail space.  The hotel will include a signature restaurant, a rooftop bar and swimming pool and a proposed rotating art exhibit which will all be open to the public. 
 
The retail component will be composed of the existing Rite Aid (in a new space) and a diverse mix of retailers, restaurants and local or small business space.
 
Read more for additional details.
 
JBG believes the "U Street Hotel" would bring the following benefits to the neighborhood, in addition to creating a “Destination Hotel" designed by David M Schwarz, the project would:
  • Increase retail foot traffic to the U Street corridor,
  • Create permanent hotel and retail jobs in addition to the 300 temporary construction jobs which would bring revenue to the neighborhood,
  • Create a venue for local artists to display their work,
  • Assist the local business community to help promote and market local business on U Street,
  • Offer neighborhood memberships so local residents can take advantage of the rooftop pool, spa and fitness center.
The current development team has three partners, led by JBG:
The U Street Hotel project also includes features consistent with Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and projects seeking LEED certification from the U.S. Green Building Council.  Features of these efforts include:
 
Transit Oriented Development Features
  • Given the proximity to Metro, bus lines, bike lanes and numerous local retail shops and stores, the location is a perfect opportunity for transit-oriented, urban development. We will reinforce the availability of non-auto related transportation options by:
    • Offer pre-paid Metro vouchers to residents and/or hotel guests
    • Provide ample bike storage and showers in the hotel
    • Collaborate with the DC Smartbike program and DDOT to provide new rental locations or advertising for bicycles or a DDOT information kiosk 
  • To reduce the automobile impact of the project and what exists on U St. today we will:
    • Provide below grade, all valet parking garage as a means to eliminate street parking problems.  The garage will be used by hotel guests and incoming shoppers and diners
    • Providing spaces for shared vehicles such as Zipcar as alternative automotive option
    • Locate the loading docks in the rear alley, mitigating traffic congestion typical of loading facilities located on the U St. corridor
Low Impact Development / LEED Certification Features
  • JBG is committed to developing sustainable and environmentally sensitive projects throughout the Washington D.C. area.   Our U St. hotel will pursue a LEED Silver certification by:
  • Reducing energy usage through efficient building design.  Using high-efficiency heating and cooling  systems, reducing heat loss/gain by appropriately sizing and shading windows, and adding lighting systems that react  to outside light to reduce energy usage and light pollution
  • Reducing water usage by using low flow toilets and faucets and exploring other systems to reduce  non-potable water uses
  • Specifying sustainable building components such as recycled concrete, sustainably harvested woods and reusing or recycling existing building materials
  • Increase indoor air quality for all occupants by using high MERV rated air filters, increased outside air and low emitting paints and carpets (low VOC)
  • Meeting or exceeding Storm Water Management (SWM) best practices to encourage natural water filtration, reducing impact on city sewer systems and neighboring properties
  • Locally grown shade trees, vegetated roofs (green roofs) and pervious pavement to reduce urban heat island effects
 
Moving ahead, JBG will continue to participate and host community meetings with project neighbors, CSNA, ANC 1B, and other government officials, boards, and agencies, including the DC Historic Preservation Review Board and the DC Zoning Commission.
 
Please visit the CSNA website for meeting notices and other information as it becomes available.
Comments
Add New Search
Enough Already!  - How many "this is a great idea posts" are from t   |2009-03-26 20:12:50
The planned hotel is a monstrocity. How would the U street area benefit from
having this behemoth stuck in the middle of it. RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT. Have we
learned nothing? Greedy developers who propose such overstuffed projects should
be seen for what they are. They don't care about the community. If they did
they would have proposed something MUCH more modest.
Dave McCullough  - Bring it down to the East side of U Street   |2009-03-25 12:20:02
Personally I think a hotel would be a great addition to the neighborhood. This
is exactly the type of development that the Metro was intended to bring. If the
neighbors in the middle of U street have such an issue with this, bring it down
to the 9th street end and tear down the housing authority and build it there.
Brian Greenberg  - Continued from previous message   |2009-03-11 13:35:10
But none of the community benefits attributed to this hotel proposal lead
logically to the necessity for such a conspicuously oversized building. The
current building design has instead been determined by JBG's transparent and
over-riding profit motive.
(Continued from previous posting) The effort to
depict the proposed collosus as in any sense architecturally consistent with the
historical character of the neighborhood should be resisted for what it is --
opportunism and greed. The current design must be revised to mitigate the
serious negative impacts our neighborhood can expect.
Brian Greenberg  - Director of Sustainable Development   |2009-03-11 13:32:24
The pro-JBG statement provided above on the 'neutral' CSNA site seriously
distorts the situation. JBG has almost completely ignored concerns
voiced repeatedly about the project by active and interested local
citizens. JBG's token, microscopic design changes in no way
'address' these concerns.
Labelling those who identify the
obvious negative consequences of this development as 'NIMBY' cynically
misconstrues constructive citizen engagement as
parochial self-interest. At the same time, one very narrow interest --
JBG's business interest -- is being depicted as 'the community's interest'.

 Most of us share an interest in improving U Street and our
neighborhood. We'd likely support good faith proposals to increase jobs,
daytime commerce, art display space, etc. But none of the community
benefits attributed to this hotel pro...
Meg  - Scale   |2009-03-11 06:33:48
Has anyone seen drawings that include representation of the neighboring
buildings? We need to appreciate the scale of this hotel in relation to
surrounding buildings rather than considering it on its own. It's an attractive
design, no doubt. But it's huge and I echo the comments of others about the
impact on pedestrian flow down the sidewalk if cuts are made, traffic, noise,
its hulking presence and the shadow the building will cast, etc.
Jon (continued)   |2009-03-10 20:39:37
our expectations and assume that every shiny new building proposal floated by a
developer will automatically result in a net benefit for the neighborhood.


And just because it's not in your backyard, that doesn't mean you should
disregard the opinions of people who will have the building right behind
them...they're your neighbors and you'd want them to listen to your concerns if
the shoe was on the other foot.
Jon (continued)   |2009-03-10 20:38:47
hotel wouldn't be sufficiently profitable dubious, and the construction would be
a serious neighborhood inconvenience because of SIGNIFICANT and unavoidable
delays that will be caused by building around the RiteAid lease.

Let's face
it, the site isn't going to be less desirable a year or two from now when
RiteAid is out of business (check any finance website for more on that) and with
that yoke gone from its neck, perhaps JBG can design something that will bring
the same benefits but will be more appropriately sized for both the lot and
neighborhood.

Again, I would LOVE to see a new building on that site (it
would raise my property value!), but in its current incarnation, this one will
hurt the neighborhood more than it will help. I realize this isn't Georgetown
and some crazy things have been built on the U & 14th strips in the past (the
Reeves Center is a prime example), but that doesn't mean that we should lower
o...
Jon   |2009-03-10 20:37:53
I'm also a neighbor (just moved to 14th and U from the Dupont/Logan border last
summer), and although I STRONGLY support redevelopment of this site with a
building that could encourage other retailers to move into the area, I agree
with those who feel that this project - as designed - isn't the right one.


I've attended 2 meetings with JBG and while I think the architects designed a
very nice looking building, its currently proposed size is outlandish when
compared to the 2 story townhouses directly behind it. It would dwarf them and
would look completely out of place.

As a native NY'er I love urban density,
but this is 13th and U, not 13th and K. People move here because the townhouses
are near good food, music, art and transportation is easy. You don't come to
13th and U (or Washington, for that matter) if you're looking for that dense
tightly-packed urban feel. I find JGB's claim that a slightly smaller boutique
Christina  - Continuation of previous message   |2009-03-09 11:34:53
(guess there's a word limit here! here's the rest of my post that got cut
off!)

...provided the community with any of the business rationale to support
that conclusion.

Oh, and for those naysayers out there who may be inclined to
disregard my professional opinion, I'm not a NIMBY. I live nearby, but it's
actually not in my backyard.
Christina  - Pro-Hotel, But Not This One   |2009-03-09 11:32:16
I am a neighbor and am in favor of a having a hotel at the proposed site. I
agree this type of business would be a good thing for our
neighborhood.

However, the size of this hotel that is being proposed (110 feet)
is completely out of scale with the neighborhood - and this city thinks so too,
because the current zoning regulations only allow for 65 feet at this location.


I am also a marketing strategy consultant specializing in travel/tourism, and
while I do agree that there is strong business rationale for a hotel at this
site, I do NOT agree with JBG's claim that they need a 250-room hotel in order
to be profitable. I believe JBG is over-reaching here, and will not be able to
achieve profitable occupancy levels with a hotel that large at this location. I
have discussed this with JBG, and their curt response was that some other third
party did the analysis and concluded 250 rooms was appropriate, but they have
not p...
Eli Wallach   |2009-03-09 08:57:11
Rite Aid has JBG and the principals by the short hairs. The developers want 110
feet, higher than the Ellington, just because that's their magic number to be
profitable. It's apparent JBG is trying to ram this project through. They said
they've studied the traffic impact, especially betw U & T Sts on 13th. That
strip will become a bottleneck with the armada of delivery, trash and supply
trucks going tonto that alley.
Andy   |2009-03-06 12:51:08
This looks great. But what about restoring the old Dunbar Hotel at this
location. I am sure the city still has the plans on record!
11th Street resident  - Let's all get our swim trunks and head to the new   |2009-03-01 14:34:21
To the person who suggested that we (as residents of the area) should have
access to the (proposed) pool: why should we be able to use the pool if we're
not paying customers? Ask the Washington Hilton if you can use their pool, and
they will say "yes, but for a fee". Why is everyone always looking for a
hand out? I just don't understand this.

We have at least three public
pools in the area (two outdoors, and one indoors). There is an indoor pool at
the Marie Reed center, an outdoor pool across from Howard University and another
public outdoor pool at Francis Junior High.

And even if there weren't, it is
not the responsibility of a private business to monitor the safety of non-paying
customers, who, if they get hurt using the pool, will certainly sue.

If you
want a pool, propose one to the Mayor and the city council.

Now, if, on the
other hand, the hotel is willing to offer swim classes to local children,...
Tom  - Street level retail?   |2009-02-27 23:45:08
I live two blocks from the site and would love to see it turn into a hotel, but
I worry that the strip of stores along U St would be replaced by a long expanse
of hotel lobby, which wouldn't do much for the vibrancy of the corridor. The
Rite Aid is fine, but is there any other street-level outward-facing retail?


Also, what's the exact site? Would it replace that strip mall building up to
the rowhouses along U, or would the rowhouses be torn down?
Joe  - I like the rooftop bar!   |2009-02-25 10:04:53
The rooftop bar is a very cool idea, and if it is high up enough it isn't
noisy.
While I think it is important neighbours have a say (and I am one) I
also think NIMBYISM can go too far - e.g. why should we have access to the pool?
Nick  - Looks good with reservations!   |2009-02-25 09:35:52
Forgot to say, we shot down the rooftop bar for Black Cat which would have held
200. U street isn't and does not want to be Adams Morgan!
Nick  - Looks good with reservations!   |2009-02-25 09:34:15
Love the hotel idea, but it needs to be 8 floors, no rooftop bar (the pool is
cool and only if accessible by the neighbors!), terrible having to keep the Rite
Aid. Otherwise great for the neighborhood businesses and property values.
Columbia Heights Dude  - Here we go again   |2009-02-25 09:10:54
And the NIMBY's are already screaming... some things never change.

The
building is not "out of scale". This is U street, not AU Park. This is
the heart of the "inner city". The U Street Corridor has always had
buildings of this scale. Just look at what is now a storage facility across from
the Reeves building.

As for the "light" argument. When did U street
become Walden Pond? If you what low slung development and all that blather, move
to Frederick or Columbia. This is a CITY!!!

Same old NIMBY naysers...
Joe  - Looks good   |2009-02-25 06:09:20
Looks like a great addition to the neighborhood. The height is appropriate in
view of proximity to metro. Additional traffic is a price that has to be paid
for development: if you don't like it, try walking or taking the metro.
This
will increase demand for neighborhood bars and restaurants. If there is plenty
of "life" here already, how come there are so many empty storefronts on
14th St, U street etc. There is plenty of room for more - also good news for
the district's tax base.
Marco   |2009-02-23 10:49:36
I think a boutique (if that's what indeed this will end up being) could be a
great addition to U Street. I think there's enough attractions in the area to
draw people into staying here, and the influx of overnight visitors would be a
boon to the area's businesses. The scale is not out of line with several other
project in the area (the ellington, the Utopia development) and higher density
is what should be followed next to Metrostops. The proposed retail mix seems
promising too.
MikeDC  - TOO BIG   |2009-02-20 23:13:09
Love the idea of a hotel, but that building is WAY TOO BIG for that location.
It is completely out of scale with the rest of the neighboring architecture. It
needs to be visually broken down into 3 buildings and is about 6 stories too
tall.
11th Street resident   |2009-02-17 22:29:24
This will be a wonderful addition to the neighborhood. The existing strip mall
is an eyesore left over from a really bad moment in DC architectural history.
The new building is beautiful and will give us a hotel which will provide jobs
for the local community and help local businesses. May restaurants may be able
to justify opening for lunch and thereby bring even more jobs in.

At a time
when many are out of work, this is, frankly, a godscend.
zach  - scale and design   |2009-02-16 14:50:52
I agree with the question of scale. It seems way too big for this neighborhood.
Yes, it is on busy U street, but you must remember all of the low story building
around the site, and how an 11-story building will affect them, especially in
winter. It should not be even as tall as the Ellington. As stated, 8, or even 6
story would be better. How many "boutique" hotels are that tall
really?

Also, the design is quite routine. The elevation given is a duplicate
of the Ellington across the street. Seriously, if you want to reflect the
diversity of U street, address its current, growing environment, its future.
Let's move beyond the what has already been done, especially when you have a
duplicate design across the street. I think a better design is definitely
possible, something that can better represent a growing area with numerous
backgrounds.
Scott   |2009-02-11 18:40:32
Wow, this looks phenomanal. I agree that this is a huge upgrade over what's
there, but more importantly will bring significantly more daytime, weekday
business to the U Street businesses. Many of the businesses currently must shut
down during the day due to lack of business. Great proposal, and I'm really
looking forward to this happening! It's similar to the Ellington in terms of
its scope and positive effect.
Lisa   |2009-02-10 12:50:46
the plan didn't show a curb cut on U Street, just one on 13th next to the
existing alley.
S. Glazerman  - Curb cut -- gah!   |2009-02-10 11:47:27
Are they going to put a curb cut on U Street?!? Even worse, a double curb cut
for a hotel driveway? Sorry if I'm ignorant of the design.

I hope not, but if
so, that would detract significantly from the pedestrian-friendly design of the
area by forcing pedestrians to dodge taxis and other vehicles coming in and out
of the hotel entrance.

U street should continue to emphasize storefronts
and store entrances with unimpeded pedestrian walkways.
Lisa   |2009-02-10 08:25:22
I've seen some of the plans and the dropoff is on U street. The valet entrance
is around the corner off of 13th St. It looks like there is 1 curb cut proposed.
I like that the garage is all below ground.
13th St. resident   |2009-02-09 23:46:10
Bryan -- they are replacing a terrible Rite Aid with the same terrible Rite Aid.
What exactly are you excited about?

Lawrence -- "under the Obama
Administration"? What does that mean? Is it like "at the dawn of a new
century" that people said 9 years ago about everything related and unrelated
to the new century? Does this project have squat to do with the change of
President?

Adam -- the hotel will give the neighborhood some much needed life?
Are you from around here? Seriously? The neighborhood has plenty of life.
13th St. resident   |2009-02-09 23:36:38
For everyone saying "super project" and "how exciting" and
"amazing" -- do you have any answers for the neighbors' legitimate
questions about height, traffic, curb cuts, and questionable value added?????
Lawrence Yanovitch  - resident 1322 T Street NW   |2009-02-09 18:05:29
super exciting project. Under the Obama Administration, U street has the
possibility of becoming a thriving center for multi-culturalism. A chic hotel
of this nature sensitive to the heritage of U street will be a great anchor
project; it should lift the status of the neighborhood and generate a virtuous
circle of new business, pedestrian life and increased security.
Bryan   |2009-02-09 17:04:09
This looks like a great project, and I've been following its progress for some
time. Our neighborhood desperately needs a hotel - and the proposed plan with
an independently-run ("boutique" hotel with impressive architecture
would be perfect. This development will give life to the streets during normal
business hours, the type of pedestrian activity that one currently only sees on
the weekends and evenings. I am also happy that there is a decent amount of
density being proposed for this location - very appropriate for a site right
next to the Metro! Good riddance to the existing one-story strip retail
building - no matter what your feelings are on the proposed development, you
have to be excited to see that replaced.
Ben   |2009-02-09 14:29:42
the rite aid needs to stay because they have a 99 year lease or something like
that. i agree anonymous that it is an awful store, though the CVS on 10th and U
or the one on 14th and W are not much better.

Clyde, to say that this is an
attempt to model the big apple is quite an over-statement. let's try to have an
honest discussion about the pros and cons and try to avoid hyperbole.
Anonymous   |2009-02-08 19:52:45
This project looks amazing
Anonymous  - Much too big!   |2009-02-07 07:30:01
As proposed, this would be a really huge building -- out of scale with the
neighborhood. Instead of 11 stories, how about 8? This will still be enormous
compared with the 2- and 3-story structures surrounding it.

Why are the
developers keeping the Rite Aid? That store is awful! The food aisle is
infested with mice. The staff are clueless and unfriendly. The shelves are
disorganized and half-bare. Why not get a better pharmacy retailer instead?
Anonymous   |2009-02-07 00:41:51
Nice looking building, certainly compared with Rite Aid.

What is being done
about traffic management? Valet-only parking mentioned is good, but one could
imagine a night-marish situation of cars backed up onto U St., which already
suffers from double-parking lunatics... and near gridlock on weekend
nights.

Where will the drop-off/front-desk be? U or 13th? How much room for
vehicles?

How about public meeting space for local-area
organizations/residents? Non-profits, condos, HOAs? Either free or at reduced
rates.
Eli Wallach   |2009-02-06 13:31:23
This particular JBG talking point stood out: "Increase retail foot traffic
to the U Street corridor." Have they ever walked down U Street to see just
how much foot traffic already exists? The crowds are already there because of
the investments and sacrifices that local businesses and residents have already
made. As if JBG is going to put U Street on the map?!?!? I welcome their
proposal but remain skeptical on a number of fronts.
Clyde E Howard Jr   |2009-02-06 13:26:09
This to me is a over the top construction monolith to the greedy. This community
is not downtown it is a community of low slung construction that brings harmony
to the surrounding neighborhood. The residents on the street to the rear of this
certainly do not want this Taj Mahal towering over their property or depriving
them of sun light on their street. The intersection of 13th and U is the most
busiest intersection in this part of Ward one. We do not need an additional
traffic generator just to satisfy someone's desire to emulate the big apple.
S. Glazerman  - Some questions for the developers   |2009-02-06 12:45:14
How many historic rowhouse facades are coming down to accommodate this? It
looks like a large building. How high is it?

Is the hotel getting a curb cut
or will the parking entrance use the existing alley? What about guest taxi
dropoff/pickup? Will there cabstand? If so, where will it be?

It looks like
the retail will just be the same Rite-Aid that currently occupies the space.
How will this improve U Street retail?

"Destination Hotel" sounds
like a fancy but marketing term, but what does that mean? People will stay at
the hotel so they can walk up and down U Street?
Anonymous   |2009-03-30 09:27:47
From the looks of it, project wont tear down row houses as there are none on the
U Street site of the site rather there is that awful Rite Aid building.

As
to sunlight deprivation to the row houses to the south of the site, it is
impossible for them to lose sunlight ast the sun moves east to west and since
those rowhouses are to the south of the site they will keep their sunlight. The
only folks who may loose some light is the Ellington to the north of the site,
but thankfully U Street is wide enough that they will not loose all light just
will have less hours of direct light on the 1st couple of floors. My guess is
that it may actually make the Allero's courtyard outfront even more pleasant
during the summer heat and increase that restaurant's revenue.
Adam   |2009-02-06 11:48:56
I agree as well. This building would be an amazing structure especially given
that the current building is an eyesore. This new hotel will give the
neighborhood a sense of place and some much needed life. It would be a shame if
this is not built as soon as possible.
Ben Rempell   |2009-02-06 11:19:30
this would be an amazing addition to U st if done well. that building that
holds the rite aid is not an attractive feature for U st, but the new building
on its own is not sufficient. it would be important to ensure that prices for
the retail space are not so outrageous that they push out any opportunities for
local restauranteurs or shops to access the space.
John Fahr   |2009-02-06 10:08:53
I agree this looks like a great addition to the neighborhood. We need a decent
hotel in the area. It's premature, but is there any indication the pool will
allow access by non-hotel guests (through a membership or similar)?
Ralph A. Segar Jr.   |2009-02-06 09:10:52
I think this will be a great addition to our neighborhood! Sure hope no one
gets caught up in not making it happen because of some small very localized
reason when the entire U street area stands to benefit from this!
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:):grin;)8):p:roll:eek:upset:zzz:sigh:?:cry
:(:x
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
< Prev   Next >